The Wrong Apocalypse (NPG Booknote)
- Lindsey Grant
- June 1, 1999
- Forum Papers
- Forum Paper
- 0 Comments
Peterson calls it “global aging”, but he is really talking about the developed world,* particularly western Europe and Japan.
Peterson calls it “global aging”, but he is really talking about the developed world,* particularly western Europe and Japan.
The Population-Environment Connection: Who Makes It? NPG Special Report by NPG April 1999 Click here for a downloadable, printable PDF version
Click here for a downloadable, printable PDF version Illegal immigration, increasingly profitable for powerful interests,Ā has added as many as 12.5 million to the U.S. populationĀ since 1960.Ā Ending the flow will demand a national consensus to fully fund enforcement, insulate it from pressures, andĀ mandate electronic verification of work eligibility. The public social costs of illegal settlement must be …
The second half of the Twentieth Century was a period of unprecedented and remarkable population growth in the United States.
Much has been written about the growing level of immigration into the United States over the past two decades.
Population growth only postpones the day of reckoning. According to the Census Bureau’s 1992 most likely “medium”‘ projection, there is the troubling prospect of nearly 400 million Americans by mid-century.
In 1798, Thomas Robert Malthus tried to inform “people that a human population, like a population of any other species, had the potential to increase exponentially were it not limited by finite support from its resource base.
In 1798, an English clergyman published an essay about human population growth that served to define the terms of debate on this issue for the next two hundred years.
Although the United States is generĀally thought of as a leader in social policy, when it comes to demographic policy the U.S. is well behind much of the rest of the world.
Around 1969, college and university students deĀveloped a major interest in the environment and, stimuĀlated by this, I began to realize that neither I nor the students had a good understanding of the implications of steady growth, and in particular, of the enormous numbers that could be produced by steady growth in modest periods of time.