If the flow of new illegal immigrants were halted, and the illegal population now here were pressured to depart voluntarily without government intervention, we believe that within several years at most their number would be reduced to near zero. That goal could be accomplished by putting into effect policies that would make it practically impossible for an illegal alien to reside here for any appreciable length of time without being apprehended, coupled with severe penalties for illegal presence when apprehended.

Requiring Verification of Legal Status for Key Transactions

We need a comprehensive federal program that would make it virtually impossible for an illegal immigrant to remain here undetected. The heart of the program would be to require government authorities or private sector officials to confirm legal status whenever anyone:

• Attempts to open a bank account, purchase bank instruments or securities, or transfer money abroad. (Banks that transfer money abroad without checking legal status should be subject to heavy fines. Such a regulation should put a stop to the transfer out of the country by illegal aliens of many billions of dollars each year.)
  
• Applies for a driver's or pilot's license, or any other commercial or occupational license.
  
• Seeks to enroll in college or post-secondary training for oneself or one?s children.
  
• Seeks medical care at a hospital. (Emergency care would be provided)
  
• Applies for a marriage license, birth certificate or other vital document.
  
• Applies for a social security number. (now required)
  
• Applies for a job. (Already required, though verification is practically nonexistent)
  
• Attempts to buy, sell or rent real estate.
  
• Applies for a credit card charge account or any other form of credit.
  
• Seeks to purchase, rent or register a vehicle, aircraft, firearm, explosives, or controlled hazardous materials.
  
  

(Click here to see our NPG Position Paper titled, Zero Tolerance For Illegal Immigration: An Urgent Policy Need.)

Verification would, for the time being, be by a telephone or online check with a central database maintained by the U.S. government. Law enforcement authorities should be alerted immediately if an illegal applicant is detected.

Penalties: Appropriate penalties are already on the books, and need only be strictly enforced by our Federal government. Present law makes illegal presence here a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in prison. It makes illegal entry after removal a felony punishable by up to two years in prison.

Faced with the near certainty of being apprehended, and, once apprehended, faced with the near certainty of being convicted for either a misdemeanor or a felony, we believe that almost all illegals, within a fairly short period of time, would choose to return voluntarily to their country of origin, and never return to the U.S. There would be no need for a government policy of mass deportation.

Penalties for Employers Who Hire or Employ Illegal Immigrants

The above is not to argue that other policies and penalties would not be required in order to reduce to near zero the estimated 10-15 million illegal immigrants now living here permanently. Jobs are the magnet that bring immigrants here and employer sanctions, which for 20 years have been a dead letter, must be enforced, with criminal penalties for employers who repeatedly, and knowingly, hire illegal immigrants. There must be, at long last, an electronic verification system put into effect that would require all employers to verify, from a government database, the legal presence of all applicants.

In addition to new hires, however, employers should also be required to dismiss all illegal aliens that are presently employed. There are an estimated seven million illegal aliens (between four and five percent of the U.S. labor force), who now have jobs in this country. In order, however, to minimize dislocations to our economy and to the lives of the illegal aliens themselves, the law could allow illegal aliens currently employed, who come forward voluntarily and register as illegal, a period of up to six months before being deported. By registering they would avoid being charged with a misdemeanor or a felony, if apprehended during this period.

To summarize: Illegal entry and illegal presence is a serious crime, and must be treated as such. We will never be able to halt illegal immigration if we continue to allow it to remain a crime without penalty. Our Federal government must, without further delay, begin to strictly enforce our present laws which make it a misdemeanor for first time offenders to be here illegally, and a felony punishable by up to two years in prison for re-entry after removal.

The Senate passed a bill (S. 2611) in May that, in defiance of all logic and common sense, called for a nation-transforming guestworker program that would allow, over the next several decades alone, tens of millions of immigrants to come here. The over 700 page bill was passed after only 10 days of debate. Under these circumstances, it is doubtful that many of the Senators who voted for the bill could have been fully aware of its disastrous provisions.

Astonishingly, before the vote there were no formal studies or hearings to try and determine the effect of the bill on our population growth, the very central issue with regard to immigration, and thus on our environment and resources. Just as mind-boggling, the so-called temporary guestworkers would not in fact be temporary, but would be able to eventually apply for citizenship! They would also be allowed, later in the program, to bring with them their wives and children! Their potential number and the population growth that would result would transform our nation and severely degrade our environment, our resources, and eventually our economy and standard of living.

Thanks to unselective legal immigration and past amnesties we already have in our country a surplus of legal unskilled workers with minimal education. There is no need to import more. According to economist Robert J. Samuelson, guestworkers would mainly legalize today's inflows of illegal immigrants, with the same consequence: we would be importing poverty.

Samuelson writes, "It's a myth that the U.S. economy 'needs' more poor immigrants." According to the Pew Hispanic Center, the illegal immigrants already here represent about 4.9 percent of the labor force.

In March 2004, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) an authoritative Washington-based think tank, published a paper titled, Guestworker Programs: Lessons from the Past and Warnings for the Future, by Vernon M. Briggs, Jr., Professor of Labor Economics at the New York State School of Labor and Industrial Relations at Cornell University.

In his paper Professor Briggs described the results of two major studies of guestworker programs, both of which, after intensive scrutiny, rejected the notion that they could be in the nation's best interest.

In the late 1970's Congress established the Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy (SCIRP) chaired by Rev. Theodore Hesburgh. After study, he explained that:

The idea of a large, temporary work program is tremendously attractive. Perhaps a better word though, would be "seductive." There is a superficial plausibility to this argument and the Commission gave it serious consideration for more than a year and a half. I can recall being very much entranced by it when I first joined the Commission. In the end, we were persuaded, after much study, that it would be a mistake to launch such a program.

In summing up, he concluded: We do not think it wise to propose a program with potentially harmful consequences to the United States as a whole.

A second major study of guestworker programs was made by the Commission on Immigration Reform (CIR), chaired for most of its life by the late Barbara Jordan. The Commission was created by the Immigration Act of 1990. With regard to guestworker programs it adamantly rejected any notion that they be viewed as part of any solution.

In its final report, CIR stated that it "remains opposed to implementation of a large-scale program for temporary admission of lesser-skilled and unskilled workers." It went on to say specifically that "a guestworker program would be a grievous mistake." (emphasis added).

Professor Briggs ends his paper with these concluding observations, which are just as true today as they were two years ago:

"The actual program experience of the past as well as the wise counsel of the distinguished Americans who served on the host of national commissions cited in this paper all warn in the starkest of terms against pursuing such programs. I know of no other element of immigration policy in which the message not to do something is so unequivocal.

"The heart of the problem is that guestworker programs seek to reconcile two sharply conflicting goals: the need to protect citizen workers from the competition of foreign workers who are willing to work for wages and in conditions that few citizens would tolerate versus the wishes of some employers who rely on labor-intensive production and service techniques to secure a plentiful supply of low-cost workers. In addition, there are always unforeseen side effects that harm the wider society.

"With 34 million low-wage workers in the current civilian labor force, the problem to confront is not a shortage of low-skilled workers; it is the oversupply of from nine to 12 million illegal immigrants that needs to be addressed. Getting illegal immigrants out of our labor force should be the first order of business for policymakers. Neither guestworker programs nor amnesties of any kind should be part of the efforts to end this labor-market nightmare. Guestworker programs do nothing to stop further illegal immigration and, in fact, they serve to condone past illegal conduct while encouraging more illegal immigration.

"Except in national emergencies, guestworker programs are bad public policy. They may meet the short-term pleas of private interest groups, but they can never meet the higher standard of being public policies that serve the national interest."

In March 2006, the Center for Immigration Studies published another excellent paper about illegal aliens and the labor market. It was titled Dropping Out: Immigrant Entry and Native Exit From the Labor Market, 2000-2005. The author was Steven Camarota, Director of Research for the Center. Dr. Camarota writes: "Advocates of legalizing illegal aliens and increasing legal immigration argue that there are no Americans to fill low-wage jobs that require relatively little education. However, data collected by the Census Bureau show that, even prior to Hurricane Katrina, there were almost four million unemployed adult natives (age 18 to 64) with just a high school degree or less, and another 19 million not in the labor force. Perhaps most troubling, the share of these less-educated adult natives in the labor force has declined steadily since 2000."

America's main challenge is to improve the conditions and opportunities for its abundance of unskilled labor, not to increase the number of their competitors.